Mackerel vs Pike
How does the nutrition of Mackerel compare to Pike? Here's a side-by-side comparison per 100g serving.
| Nutrient | Mackerel | Pike | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262kcal | 113kcal | Pike |
| Protein | 22.0g | 22.5g | Pike |
| Carbohydrates | 0.0g | 0.0g | Tie |
| Total Fat | 18.8g | 2.1g | Pike |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0.0g | 0.0g | Tie |
| Sodium | 50.0mg | 50.0mg | Tie |
| Cholesterol | 0.0mg | 0.0mg | Tie |
| Calcium | 50.0mg | 50.0mg | Tie |
| Iron | 1.2mg | 1.2mg | Tie |
| Potassium | 300.0mg | 300.0mg | Tie |
| Vitamin C | 5.0mg | 5.0mg | Tie |
Key Differences
- Pike has 57% less calories
- Pike has 89% less total fat
Track Your Daily Nutrition
Keep track of what you eat and hit your nutrition goals with a calorie tracking app.